Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
Quantitative assessment of dosimetric effect of using alternative OAR delineations in treatment planning as functions of delineations, setup uncertainty and planning techniques using an alternative truth assessment method.
ArXiv;
2024 Jan 11.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38259341
2.
A method to estimate the effect of deformable image registration uncertainties on daily dose mapping.
Med Phys;
39(2): 573-80, 2012 Feb.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-22320766
3.
Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating systematic patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
Med Phys;
39(2): 1102-11, 2012 Feb.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-22320820
4.
Knowledge-based quality control of organ delineations in radiation therapy.
Med Phys;
49(3): 1368-1381, 2022 Mar.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-35028948
5.
OpenKBP-Opt: an international and reproducible evaluation of 76 knowledge-based planning pipelines.
Phys Med Biol;
67(18)2022 09 12.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-36093921
6.
Sensitivity of postplanning target and OAR coverage estimates to dosimetric margin distribution sampling parameters.
Med Phys;
38(2): 1018-27, 2011 Feb.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-21452739
7.
Estimation of three-dimensional intrinsic dosimetric uncertainties resulting from using deformable image registration for dose mapping.
Med Phys;
38(1): 343-53, 2011 Jan.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-21361202
8.
A distance to dose difference tool for estimating the required spatial accuracy of a displacement vector field.
Med Phys;
38(5): 2318-23, 2011 May.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-21776765
9.
Multiobjective, Multidelivery Optimization for Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning.
Adv Radiat Oncol;
5(2): 279-288, 2020.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-32280828
10.
Dose escalation in the definite target volume.
Med Phys;
47(7): 3174-3183, 2020 Jul.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-32267535
11.
An Automated Workflow to Improve Efficiency in Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning by Prioritizing Organs at Risk.
Adv Radiat Oncol;
5(6): 1324-1333, 2020.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-33305095
12.
Beam modeling and beam model commissioning for Monte Carlo dose calculation-based radiation therapy treatment planning: Report of AAPM Task Group 157.
Med Phys;
47(1): e1-e18, 2020 Jan.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-31679157
13.
Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating random patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
Med Phys;
36(9): 3880-90, 2009 Sep.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-19810460
14.
Monte Carlo-based adaptive EPID dose kernel accounting for different field size responses of imagers.
Med Phys;
36(8): 3582-95, 2009 Aug.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-19746793
15.
A deliverable four-dimensional intensity-modulated radiation therapy-planning method for dynamic multileaf collimator tumor tracking delivery.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys;
71(5): 1526-36, 2008 Aug 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-18640500
16.
An energy transfer method for 4D Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Med Phys;
35(9): 4096-105, 2008 Sep.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-18841862
17.
Assessment of dose reconstruction errors in image-guided radiation therapy.
Phys Med Biol;
53(3): 719-36, 2008 Feb 07.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-18199911
18.
The effect of statistical noise on IMRT plan quality and convergence for MC-based and MC-correction-based optimized treatment plans.
J Phys Conf Ser;
102: 12020, 2008 Apr 04.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-20148126
19.
Quality assurance tool for organ at risk delineation in radiation therapy using a parametric statistical approach.
Med Phys;
45(5): 2089-2096, 2018 May.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-29481703
20.
Robust radiotherapy planning.
Phys Med Biol;
63(22): 22TR02, 2018 11 12.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-30418942